Although I suspect the male readership of this blog is somewhat low, I have decided to make a cameo to discuss the topic of “football” (aka soccer).
One of the elements of sporting life that I find interesting about London is how much more popular football is than any other sport. In the US, you can really make a case for (American) football, basketball, or baseball being legitimate #1 sports. Or at least they are close. Not so in London, though. The margin between #1 sport and #2 sport is so large that I really can not even tell you what the #2 sport is – rugby, cricket, tennis, who knows?
A couple of weeks ago, my cousin Blake, Kate, and I went to a Premiership game featuring Chelsea vs. Blackburn. After the game, and after a season of watching football, I have a few observations about the sport:
1. The atmosphere at the games is pretty intense, but not quite as dangerous as I had hoped. Part of this might be explained by the fact that there are an incredible number of police officers (see photo above), including a solid ring of probably 300 police encircling the entire visiting fan section. One thing I found quite odd, though, is that beer is not allowed in the stands since in general Europe seems to be more alcohol-centric than the US. I asked a fellow fan about this and received a five minute rant on how London is an authoritarian government which treats its citizens like children and that he wants to move to Paris because he can park his bike on the sidewalks there. Strange.
Another slight difference from US sporting events is the massive amount of swearing. Not that US sporting events are immune from an irate fan screaming profanity, but at English football matches the swearing is neatly incorporated into songs which are chanted by the fans. One note if you plan to go to an English football game, you should learn these songs ahead of time because you won’t understand many words outside of the profanities which are communicated clearly. Also, it is interesting that many of these chants are to the tunes of children’s Bible songs, such as “Jesus loves the little children.”
2. Relegation is absolutely brilliant and incredible. The English Premier League consists of the top 20 English clubs. Beneath that is the Championship league, which consists of the next 20 best English clubs, much like a minor league. The brilliant element here is that at the end of every season the bottom three teams from the Premier League are “relegated” into the lower league and the top three teams from that league are promoted into the Premier League.
I find this genius, offering the potential to simultaneously solve many of our country’s greatest sports problems, such as throwing games to improve draft position, having teams that are perpetually horrible, and the BCS. Let me explain that last point. What if each BCS conference program aligned with a non-BCS conference and the bottom two schools in the BCS conference each year gets relegated? This would give schools like TCU a fighting chance and make more conference games much more interesting, plus it would address those who accuse the BCS of being an anti-competitive monopoly. And it just seems fairer.
One element of the Premier League that needs some work, though, is that there is no playoff. There are various other tournament type set-ups throughout the year, but the Premier League itself is decided by the regular season. Seems lame. They also really need to get the tie-breaker situation in tournaments sorted. I saw Chelsea play Barcelona, the best offensive team in Europe, on the road and shut them out 0-0 and then play them to 1-1 draw at home only to get denied a chance to play in the Champions League Finals. The tie-breaker is based on where the goal was scored (whether home or away). I am not a Chelsea fan and I even felt like I had been robbed. Two tie games and you declare a winner!?!?!? I was literally shocked.
3. Finally, I feel like I should offer a brief endorsement of European football as a game. I typically only watch soccer in the US during the World Cup, which I suspect still places me somewhere in the top 10% of soccer fans nationally. But now that I have invested some time watching more games, I have really begun to appreciate it. It has always seemed a bit odd that the US so vehemently disagrees with the rest of the world on this point.
A couple of concluding notes. One is that I am sure Kate (and others) will make fun of me for using the term “football” in place of “soccer” within this post. But I don’t care, that’s what they call it here. The second is that I recognize this has turned into a very lengthy post, which is why I have labelled the next section on how Kate and I picked our teams to support as a “Sidebar” to create a more “optional” sounding feel about it. But if you’ve already read until this point…
SIDEBAR: How we determined our Premiership loyalties
It was the English passion for football that led Kate and I, almost as soon as we arrived, to begin discussing our football allegiances. (This is not dissimilar to the process that Kate and I went through when we decided to do school in Chicago and quickly decided to become avid Cubs fans.) We naturally began our research efforts by speaking to the locals. Unfortunately we quickly realized that there were a lot of differing opinions, each articulated with a certain matter-of-factness that made it difficult to really believe much of what we heard.
I think I (predictably) took the decision of which Premiership team to support to somewhat of a different level than Kate. I say that because Kate had pretty much made her decision of which team to support within the first few weeks of being here. Her logic was basically that, of the people we spoke with, she seemed to like Liverpool fans the best. Plus, she likes the accent of people from Liverpool. I don’t think it hurt that Liverpool also has a really classy looking uniform.
But I was still undecided. First of all I was torn on how good of a team I should select. For the past several years, basically the same 4 Premiership teams have placed at the top of the league. Picking one of these teams would make me somewhat of a bandwagon fan, but not picking one of these teams would pretty much guarantee that I would never get to follow a contender and that I would never see the team play once I went back to the US (as most games played in the US only involve the top clubs). My other consideration is that I preferred to support a local London team (5 of the 20 Premiership teams are from London) because I felt that was most defensible as a basis for loyalty.
In came Bill Simmons from ESPN. For anyone interested in picking a Premiership team, I highly recommend reading his informative article on the subject:
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/060719. His material is somewhat dated and I did not end up agreeing with his choice, but he makes some good points which helped along the way.
In the end, I have decided to become an Arsenal fan. They are London based (defensible), they are a top 4 team (contenders) but at the bottom of the top 4 right now (not too bandwagony), they play an aggressive offensive style (more fun), and have one of the lowest payrolls but compensate with a genius coach and strong team play (which makes them likable). Their nickname is also the “Gunners” which sounds cool.